Device issued for the protection of competition and Prevention of monopolistic practices, a decision the invalidity of a number of items of standard contracts between Apple and its distributors on a number of levels in Egypt and abroad, in violation of the provisions of the law on protection of competition and Prevention of monopolistic practices.
Machine indicated that the competition interface between the same product (intra-brand competition) is no less important than competition between different products (inter-brand competition) in any market concerned; and where the competition interface will help to increase the efficiency of the distribution networks and help to lower prices among distributors in the best interest of the consumer who is able to get products at the best prices and the highest quality level of Service.
The device was revealed in a statement today about the dangers of Apple’s and distributors law of protection of competition, in order to bring the agreement to isolate the Egyptian market geographically from the consequences of competition interfaces and the Prohibition of parallel importation agreements exclusive distribution in violation of Article 7 of the law on protection of competition, which has led to higher prices for their products in Egypt unjustifiably exceed the prices of the products in the Middle East countries as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait as well as United States of America.
This content from :
The post Egypt accuses Apple of violating Protection Act updated violated appeared first on sideburns should be.